Tag Archives: In-house

Do-it-Yourself Marketing or CRM – Which is Right for You? Five Points

Situation: A CEO is looking at customer relations management (CRM) systems. To date their marketing and sales has been in-house, but he wants to investigate alternatives. What CRM systems are available and what is the experience of others with these systems? Is do-it-yourself marketing advisable or should he work with a CRM system? Is do-it-yourself marketing or CRM right for you?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Marketing, whether Do-it-Yourself or working with a CRM system, must always be in line with the company’s brand and customer set.
    • The solution selected and implemented should never confuse or dilute the brand.
  • There are many CRM systems. Check out https://www.top10.com/crm for comparisons.
    • Good systems will track both prospects and sales.
    • Some can also help to create newsletters and other marketing materials.
  • Use your resources wisely.
    • Use clubs, affiliations or organizations to target the company’s market.
  • Before securing a firm or individual to design or refresh your web presence, first know your brand and what you want to communicate. This helps to identify the right resource.
  • Resources for free or low cost marketing:
    • Focus on and work with distributors.
    • Sell through key client audiences and pay them a commission on sales gained.
    • Give key client audiences a reward that will appeal to them.
    • Serve PDFs through your web site to deliver content in your preferred, branded format.

[like]

How Do You Add a New Capability? Four Approaches

Situation: A CEO reports that customers frequently ask whether the company can deliver a service that isn’t current in their portfolio of capabilities. In a substantial number of cases, the ability to offer this service is a key factor in their choice of vendors. The company’s experience with outside consultants offering this capacity has been disappointing. How do you add a new capability?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Reevaluate the company’s needs and assess whether these can be better meet by bringing this capability in-house, or by restructuring how the company works with contractors. Determine whether the latter is just a negotiation and contract / payment problem.
  • Take a closer look at how the company contracts and creates incentives for outside contractors. Do they have performance objectives written into their contracts that reward them for meeting contract commitments? Can they earn bonuses for beating contract deadlines or exceeding design requirements? Are there penalties them for missing key deadlines?
    • Is it clear whether contractors are missing deadlines because of the “creative process,” because they don’t use their time efficiently, or because they have other commitments that take precedence at the company’s expense?
    • If the answer is either of the two latter situations, then contract adjustments may work. Similarly, if they have an incentive to be more creative faster to meet a bonus deadline a contract adjustment could also work to the company’s benefit.
    • Another option in working with independents is to make it clear that the company is generous, but if the contractor does not meet deadlines, they go to the bottom of the list for future opportunities.
  • An option is to hire one specialist and challenge them to grow a practice within the company. This may mean that they have to do all tasks early on, but the potential win will be the opportunity to grow a significant business and hire a team to do the lower-level work under their direction.
  • Another option – bring on a creative problem solver with appropriate experience who can support the existing team, but who will have more flexibility than a pure specialist.

[like]

What are the Pros & Cons of In-House Software Development? Three Points

Situation: A company used internal resources for a small in-house project – developing web-based time sheets. They had obtained bids for external development but found that internal resources could do the same time for about half of what external development would cost. The trade-off was slow delivery. What are the pros & cons of in-house software development?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Why was delivery slow?
    • When faced with a choice in priority between the internal development task vs. responding to the needs of external customers, internal delivery was pushed back in time.
  • This is exactly what others have experienced when faced with the choice between internal and external software development. Look at the trade-off, not just in terms of “cost” quoted by internal developers, but also in terms of opportunity cost. The real cost is what these resources could have provided had the same time been spent to support external revenue-producing projects.
  • Just as the company did in the first place, get external bids. If the use of internal resources is an option, compare time to delivery forecasted using internal resources plus any other internal costs. Then analyze the opportunity cost of not dedicating these resources to revenue-producing activity. The sum of these costs should then be compared with external bids. Adding opportunity cost to the analysis can make a big difference.
  • Once the company has this information, make a business decision as to the best choice. Keep in mind that unless the priorities of the internal group doing the development work are changed, they may not respond to the needs of the internal project on a timely basis. It will be the CEO’s call as to whether the developers prioritize their time to support external projects or the internal project.

[like]

How Do You Launch an Internet Portal? Four Considerations

Situation: A finance company wants to revise its web portal. The objective is to provide up-to-date specialized financial information to clients for a subscription fee. Currently information is provided directly to clients. The portal will allow clients to manipulate the data provided to gain greater insight into their own strategies and operations. How do you launch an Internet portal?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • This presents an opportunity to bring several niche services together under one umbrella.
  • The plan is to make money by selling subscriptions. A challenge will be determining how much clients are willing to pay for this service.
    • Perform an analysis to determine how much clients can either make or save by utilizing the new service.
    • Try a menu approach with varying fees depending upon the number and frequency of services accessed.
  • To more quickly gain recognition and credibility, consider partnering with an existing well-established entity such as Bloomberg. Design your portal to integrate your data into their existing traffic flow.
    • This reduces the development effort because the partner already has the shell and a well-established market presence.
  • As an alternative to partnering, it may be best for the company to develop the portal on its own.
    • In this case, if there is a tightly defined target audience and the company already possesses all the equipment and programming required to launch its own portal, it may be best to carefully select initial clients and for the company to do everything itself.
    • If the company has the necessary access to key target clients, this will save the need to split revenue with a partner.

[like]

How Do You Scale with Scarce Talent? Four Factors

Situation: A software company relies on in-house expertise to both position itself and come up with unique solutions to clients’ problems. The CEO wants to significantly scale up the number of clients served per year. The challenge is that it is difficult to find software engineers who are experienced in a wide range of code languages. How do you scale with scarce talent?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Start by looking at the load carried by your current employees. Do they have the capacity to significantly increase the number of clients that they serve? Do you have sufficient back-up to serve existing and new clients should something happen to a key employee? It’s one thing to have ambition to expand, but another to assure that you have the capacity to serve both existing and new clients.
  • Take a close look at your org chart.
    • What happens and where are the exposures when you double the current service volume? Where will the greatest stresses occur? These are the first areas in which you should start to build redundancy.
    • From an HR standpoint, you need a leadership development plan that extends down your organization chart. Use the stress analysis just mentioned to identify the areas in greatest need of additional resources and leadership development.
  • Look for areas where you can off-load current responsibilities to support staff to increase the capacity of your current talent. This increases potential capacity as well as the overall value of the company.
    • The lack of redundancy may prove to be detrimental to your ability to attract new large clients. Large potential clients and partners will use whatever means they have at their disposal (including stealth visits to your offices by local reps) to vet your organization before they make a commitment to you.
  • New client and partner relationships are like new product introductions.
    • A few early adopters will jump on your opportunity.
    • Many of the most established clients or partners will sit on the sideline to monitor the experience of early adopters.
    • If you trip in your service delivery early in your scale-up, most of the remaining targets will be slow to support your offering.
    • Count on the first two years of building additional clientele to be very intensive. It will distract you from many of the functions you perform today, unless you have additional personnel to support this.

[like]