Tag Archives: Cost

How Do You Manage Major Projects? Seven Points

Situation: A company conducts both engineering feasibility studies and development projects. These are high budget projects and must be managed diligently to prevent cost overruns. What have others done to assure that projects are planned and managed to budget? How do you manage major projects?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • What is the structure of most contracted projects?
    • Most projects are fixed price. They come from feasibility studies which are essentially “marketing” for future sales. Typical terms are 30% up front, with the other 30/30/10 upon achievement of milestones and completion of the project.
  • Get complete buy-in from the customer as part of the initial negotiation.
  • Stay ahead of expenses by billing in time to maintain positive cash flow from the projects.
  • Structure pricing so that custom work is profitable if the project mix is 50/50 custom vs. standard work.
  • Push-back if the customer wants to reduce project cost up-front.
  • Carefully document work papers – above what is required by the contract. Get buy-in for this in advance, during the initial negotiation.
  • Once the feasibility study is completed, revise the scope and deliverables of the work agreement based on findings from the study.
  • Separate the “concept” phase from the execution phase and charge a premium for the concept work.
    • Position this as a value to the customer.

[like]

How Do You Fund Growth Strategically? Five Approaches

Situation: A CEO is looking at a significant investment in capital equipment. Being considered are not just the cost of the investment, but the opportunity cost of not making the investment and the impact that this will have on the business. An additional consideration is the business mix of the company and whether to shift focus from low volume/high margin to low margin/high volume products. What tools have others used to assess these trade-offs? How do you fund growth strategically?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Review the company’s approach to contracts. It may be desirable to revise the approach in light of the new objective. The switch from low volume/high margin to low margin/high volume products impacts not only production but also marketing, sales, finance and accounting.
  • Price some early new contracts below market to finance the additional equipment expenditures, as well as to test market response to the new offering. This will help to identify additional adjustments that are needed for the new approach and offering to succeed.
  • Structure the financing options for equipment purchases creatively, for example by allowing for participation by customers and investors.
  • Watch changes in working capital at all times and keep it under control. Working capital is a commitment of resources just as is buying equipment or facilities.
  • Consider all resource commitments as investments, regardless of the way the accountants deal with them as in expensing vs. capitalizing these investments on the balance sheet. For example, a marketing program is an investment even though it will show up as an operating expense. Make sure that this can be justified in terms of future cash flows expected.

[like]

What’s the Optimum Business Strategy: Going Broader or Deeper? Five Points

Situation: A CEO wants to expand her company’s business base, either by diversifying its client base, or by going deeper into current clients. What are some of the key questions that should be considered as they evaluate these two alternatives? What’s the optimum business strategy – going broader or deeper?

Advice of the Forum:

  • If the company diversifies, what will be the perception of current clients?
    • Will they see this as more or less beneficial to their interests?
  • What are the most important objectives – what is leadership trying to achieve? Does the response to this question weigh in favor or one or the other alternative?
  • Analyze the available markets, as well as the company’s current share of the existing market. Is the company the dominant player in its market or is there still ample growth opportunity by investing in deeper penetration of the existing market?
  • Are there important vulnerabilities regarding the current client base? Is the company too dependent on a small number of customers? What will happen if key customers decide to choose another vendor or to develop internal resources to meet their needs?
  • For the option to go deeper into the current client base, what is the resource match between the objective and current resources?
    • Do current employees have the appropriate competencies?
    • What is the available time and dollars to pursue the market?
    • What is the ROI target and what are the risks?
    • Does the company have the right infrastructure to pursue the market, or will it require developing additional infrastructure? What is the cost of development in time, money and resources?
    • It is an area in which the company can excel, and does it align with the passion and drive of the current business focus?

[like]

How Do You Expand into a New Market? Four Points

Situation: A company is interested in expanding into new market. The CEO notes that they have little experience in this market, but it is lucrative, and they believe that their technology has effective applications in this market. How do you expand into a new market?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • If the new market is technical it is important to identify the standards that govern production in that market. Examples include ISO 9000 processes and 13485 ISO Medical Standards. Start work on these now to assure that the products and services under development meet market standards.
    • While it will take effort to become ISO compliant, this investment will bring significant benefits in terms of regularizing all the company’s processes and procedures.
    • There may be some early resistance, but the long-term benefit is worth the pain.
    • Being ISO certified helps the company to sell its services. Many clients will not consider the company as a serious vendor unless it is ISO certified.
  • Pull in an outside consultant to do a quick gap analysis between where the company’s current procedures are and where they need to meet the standards.
  • Will ISO certification provide a competitive advantage?
    • It will never disadvantage the company and may provide a competitive advantage with customers.
    • Use Blue Ocean Strategy to create a new advantage for the company around ISO certification.
    • Industry will eventually require vendors to increasingly become ISO certified. If the company is already there it will be ahead of the curve and may be able to gain a premium price for its products and services by being there ahead of others.
    • European and International companies increasingly insist on ISO certification – they are ahead of the US.
    • Create a Market Road Map. Identify the markets that the company could serve. Look at the requirements for doing business in these markets. It may be possible to find additional leverage in ISO certification that will allow the company to enter additional markets with minor incremental additional cost.
  • Will ISO certification add an additional cost structure to the company’s services?
    • Under ISO, a company can have both ISO and non-ISO projects. Company standards will simply identify which projects are which and when non-ISO standards apply. Standards can be changed under ISO as new non-ISO opportunities arise. It is just a matter of updating procedures.

[like]

How Do You Take Advantage of a New Technology? Two Foci

Situation: A company has had early success with a promising new technology that compliments the company’s strategic direction. Their objective is to become one of the top suppliers and servicers of this technology in their service area. How do you take advantage of a new technology?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Leverage the company’s strengths to create an early advantage in this technology.
    • Create a low-cost delivery system to take advantage of opportunities available through this technology initially at a lower margin, then offer enhancements to build margin to company norms.
    • Investigate other markets and applications where this low-cost delivery system can generate you new opportunities.
  • It is early to assess whether the new technology will become dominant, or just the latest fad. It has been on the market for less than two years and is just taking off.
    • Take the next few months to dig into what is happening within vendors of the technology, and how they are perceived by their client companies.
    • Talk to CIOs about their perceptions of the technology based on the last few quarters of experience – quality of implementation, quality of service. Other providers add a layer to the cost – is the service worth the cost or do client companies save over time through overhead reduction?
    • Talk to other vendors from other market areas – learn from their experience selling and working with the technology.
    • How do the other vendors make money? Are costs to their corporate clients offset by savings implementing the technology? What margins are the others enjoying and does this come from the initial technology, from add-on services, or complimentary sales. What is the perception of the sustainability of this technology both within the providers and to the CIOs? What about the technology really irks corporate clients? Where is the soft underbelly of this technology? Research may assist in making future decisions on how to approach the technology and clients.

[like]

What Do You Manage as You Adapt to Market Conditions? Four Points

Situation: A company is in the process of adjusting its customer and business focus in response to changing market conditions. Gross margin on projects that have been the company mainstay in the past have fallen significantly. The CEO is evaluating different adjustments to address this. What do you manage as you adapt to market conditions?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The company’s business model is shifting from a staffing agency to a product development model. This means that the business must be driven by a different set of parameters and metrics:
    • A different time/utilization mix.
    • Different personnel – the company needs managers.
    • Changes to the organizational chart and incentives.
  • How does the company currently charge clients for Project Management?
    • Currently it is time and materials.
    • Consider charging on a percent of project cost basis. For example, 15% of total project cost. The pitch will be that the client will be able to reduce the overall cost of the project – ideally in both dollars and time – and that the company will have increased accountability for delivering these results.
  • How will this impact the company’s cash position? How will the company retain adequate cash flow during the transition?
    • The current cash position is 4 months of projected monthly cash plus receivables.
    • If there is drop to 3 months, flag a yellow caution light.
    • Two months becomes a red light.
    • What is the backstop if the company runs shy – if, for example, some engineers are not very active? In this case, will deferral of unpaid vacation time and other options allow the company to survive without further draining cash? Have a meeting with key managers to evaluate the impact of this option.
  • Consider looking at competitors for possible collaborations. This can be delicate because they may want to steal the company’s personnel and there are other risks, but sometimes promising deals can be arranged.

[like]

How Do You Focus on Doing Things Right? Seven Recommendations

Situation: A CEO is concerned that her company is not as efficient or effective as it could be. Of the key activities where the company is focused, few have any obvious connection to the customer or the customers’ needs. How do you focus on doing things right?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Create a set of cost graphs to parallel the company’s revenue graphs. If these are put side by side, does it indicate that the company is doing some things that add relatively low value and profit? What happens if resources are shifted away from less valuable activity?
  • Concentrate resources on doing one profitable thing well. Become best in class at this one thing. This may both increase the value of the firm and help to focus future development.
  • Bring in a senior level marketing research person or marketing manager with marketing research experience to determine what the customer wants, how should the company compete, and what current customers may be willing to pay for its software.
  • Strengthen the primary product – it represents 90% of sales. This is where the company has the best understanding of both its customers and the market. Look at what it takes to become enterprise wide with the company’s largest customers. Expand vertical capabilities and build $1 million accounts to $5 million a year.
  • The company already has a diverse group of clients, many of whom are huge.
    • How deep is the company in each of these clients? It may be easier and less expensive from a sales standpoint to go deeper into these clients than to bring on new clients.
    • Look for ways to make current $1 million clients $5 million clients by selling what the company currently sell to more of their divisions and locations.
    • The key to executing this strategy is to listen closely to what clients’ needs are and adjust or customize the offering to better meet their needs.
  • Focus on solutions and reduce the cost of solution implementation. Consider becoming more vertical in one key implementation and become the best at that.
  • Create a relevant framework for the company’s strategy. For what purpose is it necessary to do the right thing? If the purpose is to exit in 2 to 3 years, this yields a very different strategy than if the objective to dominate the company’s market in a 5 to10 year period.

[like]

What are the Pros & Cons of In-House Software Development? Three Points

Situation: A company used internal resources for a small in-house project – developing web-based time sheets. They had obtained bids for external development but found that internal resources could do the same time for about half of what external development would cost. The trade-off was slow delivery. What are the pros & cons of in-house software development?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Why was delivery slow?
    • When faced with a choice in priority between the internal development task vs. responding to the needs of external customers, internal delivery was pushed back in time.
  • This is exactly what others have experienced when faced with the choice between internal and external software development. Look at the trade-off, not just in terms of “cost” quoted by internal developers, but also in terms of opportunity cost. The real cost is what these resources could have provided had the same time been spent to support external revenue-producing projects.
  • Just as the company did in the first place, get external bids. If the use of internal resources is an option, compare time to delivery forecasted using internal resources plus any other internal costs. Then analyze the opportunity cost of not dedicating these resources to revenue-producing activity. The sum of these costs should then be compared with external bids. Adding opportunity cost to the analysis can make a big difference.
  • Once the company has this information, make a business decision as to the best choice. Keep in mind that unless the priorities of the internal group doing the development work are changed, they may not respond to the needs of the internal project on a timely basis. It will be the CEO’s call as to whether the developers prioritize their time to support external projects or the internal project.

[like]

How do You Develop and Retain Talent in a Competitive Market? Six Points

Situation: A company must acquire new engineering talent to sustain its growth. However, there are few local engineers who are experienced in company’s key technologies, and the cost of living in the company’s location makes it difficult to bring in new talent. The CEO is considering developing a remote office where there are experienced engineers that they could attract to the company. How do you develop and retain talent in a competitive market?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • There are a number of issues to consider: location, management of the culture, leadership and potential unintended consequences that must be mitigated.
  • The COVID pandemic has forced companies to adapt to remote employees. Has this been considered as an option?
    • High definition, large screen systems can be set up for $2-3,000 per site.
    • Web cams, projectors, etc. can be set up for several hundreds of dollars per site.
    • Add to this design and analysis tools, with technology for prototyping.
  • Consider where within the organization the remote people will fit?
    • How will the organizational structure impact the integration of design engineering and manufacturing engineering?
    • What policies and procedures are needed to assure that there is no clash?
  • How will leadership be implemented for the remote group?
    • One CEO feels that there must be a sponsor from the home office to assure smooth and consistent transfer of company culture to the remote operation. This may take 1-2 years to achieve.
    • Another CEO hired a qualified individual locally for their remote operation. The important point was that this company has a very tight process and found that they could package this process sufficiently so that the new individual could pick it up quickly.
  • Look at developing a remote office as essentially the same challenge as a mini-acquisition. Like an acquisition, the key resource being gained is new talent. Think through the integration process and trade-offs as though it were a new acquisition.
  • Developing a remote location can be a good solution for advancing the company’s ability to outsource. It will teach the company:
    • How to design using a combination of internal and remote resources,
    • What infrastructure is needed in terms of policies and protocols around designs, and
    • What works from a communications standpoint to assure knowledge transfer between sites.

[like]

How Do You Manage Growth in a Difficult Economy? Seven Suggestions

Situation: A CEO’s company has struggled due to difficult business conditions during the last year. Top among the challenges has been poor execution in hiring quality people, not because they weren’t available, but due to uncertainty. He is also concerned about infrastructure issues, particularly in IT. How do you manage growth in a difficult economy?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Focusing on IT, a key element for success in IT is having a clear definition of company needs. How does IT serve the company? What are the goals and objectives of the IT system? What kind of load must it be able to handle? What aspects of the system are most critical to company success?
  • Finding quality talent with the necessary experience is a challenge; particularly if solid goals and objectives haven’t been developed.
  • One CEO shared success managing IT. The company hired two IT professionals and had them report to an internal committee. This committee then communicated effectively with management.
  • Another CEO observed that some IT people look at their job as a process rather than a function; they just show up and fix things. Management of IT was improved by establishing clear objectives and holding the IT staff accountable for their performance against these objectives.
  • Another CEO told the story of terminating their IT person due to lack of consistency. IT must operate under management oversight, with clearly defined goals and objectives, and accountability.
  • Outsourcing some IT functions can help if used with care. On-site staff can focus on system maintenance and fight the inevitable fires.
  • IT costs should be thoroughly reviewed. They can be expensive. Look at IT costs as a percent of sales and compare expenditures with others in the industry sector.
  • Take a similar approach with other functions needing attention.

[like]