Tag Archives: Equipment

How Do You Fund Growth Strategically? Five Approaches

Situation: A CEO is looking at a significant investment in capital equipment. Being considered are not just the cost of the investment, but the opportunity cost of not making the investment and the impact that this will have on the business. An additional consideration is the business mix of the company and whether to shift focus from low volume/high margin to low margin/high volume products. What tools have others used to assess these trade-offs? How do you fund growth strategically?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Review the company’s approach to contracts. It may be desirable to revise the approach in light of the new objective. The switch from low volume/high margin to low margin/high volume products impacts not only production but also marketing, sales, finance and accounting.
  • Price some early new contracts below market to finance the additional equipment expenditures, as well as to test market response to the new offering. This will help to identify additional adjustments that are needed for the new approach and offering to succeed.
  • Structure the financing options for equipment purchases creatively, for example by allowing for participation by customers and investors.
  • Watch changes in working capital at all times and keep it under control. Working capital is a commitment of resources just as is buying equipment or facilities.
  • Consider all resource commitments as investments, regardless of the way the accountants deal with them as in expensing vs. capitalizing these investments on the balance sheet. For example, a marketing program is an investment even though it will show up as an operating expense. Make sure that this can be justified in terms of future cash flows expected.

[like]

How Do You Guide a Company Through a Sale? Five Thoughts

Situation: A company was built on capital equipment complemented by annuity sales of supplies used by the equipment. The company is moving toward automation of technology and offshore production of OEM equipment. An OEM partner will take on the equipment side of the business and the company will focus on automated supply solutions with sales direct to the end customer. The OEM partner has approached the company with a purchase offer. How do you guide a company through a sale?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • It is important to determine the value proposition, both from the company’s standpoint and the standpoint of the OEM buyer. The company’s objective will be to optimize the intersection of these two views of the value proposition — to its benefit.
  • Look at current employees and the technology and determine what to do to preserve their positions and interests. This will become part of the negotiation, but it is essential to have a clear idea of how this meshes with the CEO’s personal priorities.
  • Look to outside experts for advice on exit and succession planning.
  • Determine the CEO’s vision and path of involvement up to the sale. This involvement is negotiable, but should remain consistent with the CEO’s vision during the negotiation.
  • What is the company’s patent position, and the value of the patents in terms of future revenue? IP produces a future revenue stream. Consider the valuation to be in the range of 4 years of IP value.

[like]

Where Should You Focus the Business? Four Recommendations

Situation: A company has experienced limited growth and profitability for the past five years. It is also short of resources. They have invested a lot of time and effort in a new technology which has yet to bear fruit. The CEO seeks advice on the company’s future direction. Where should you focus the business?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Continue to support BOTH business – the core product line and the new technology – but rearrange priorities to boost revenue and profitability growth. Simultaneously, focus new R&D investment in the company’s core product. This has three principal benefits:
    • The company’s primary expertise is in its core product line. This product is its principal source of revenue and has the greatest potential for profitability and growth.
    • R&D and start-up production of new iterations of the principal product is less resource intensive than the new technology.
    • Further, sales of the core product are far less cyclical than the market for the new technology, and therefore more promising to a small, niche company.
  • Looking at this recommendation sequentially, the group recommends that the company:
    • Continue to sell the current product line a well as existing complimentary products to maintain revenue and profits.
    • If additional work or resources are needed to mature the new technology, have someone else take the lead role in R&D and private label the technology for the company.
    • Focus all new R&D investment on improvements to the core product.
    • Refocus market research on current and potential customers for the principal product line to determine their greatest needs to guide product line innovation.
  • The company needs access to advanced equipment to support development of the core product line. Consider creative ways to gain access to this equipment at little expense.
    • Look for advanced equipment that is available at distress or liquidation-sale prices by companies who made poor investment decisions.
  • Find a partner that wants to focus on the new technology, but who also wants and needs the company’s expertise in its core product line.
    • The company focuses on the core line; let the partner develop the technology.

[like]

How Do You Position the Company for Growth? Four Key Points

Situation: A company is completing the design of a new line of equipment which is expected to drive future growth. An important distributor for a company’s principal product – a consumable – also distributes equipment. The CEO is concerned that this distributor may perceive his new line of equipment as competing with their existing line. How should the CEO handle this? How do you position the company for growth?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Meet with the CEO of the distributor and ask two questions:
    • Can they sell the company’s new line of equipment, as well?
    • Do they have any other source for the company’s consumable product?
    • If the distributor must rely on the company for the consumable, whether they decide to distribute the new equipment line or not, there should not be any risk.
  • The company has a wonderful opportunity to start doing business in a new way.
    • The company has a proprietary consumable and chemistry/formulation knowledge that will be difficult for others to copy.
    • The company now has knowledge of how to design equipment that utilizes the consumable.
    • Proprietary trade secrets may be more valuable than patents, presuming that the company can keep a lid on these secrets. Coca Cola and 3M have never sought patents on their key products. In a well-managed environment, trade secrets have a much longer life than patents.
  • Think about the sales mix in a new way, one that would address concerns about the annuity vs. capital equipment mix as well as improve overall profitability.
    • Focus on turn-key solutions. Use Hewlett Packard as a model. HP makes the most money selling paper and ink cartridges – annuity products; not from selling printers which sell less frequently than the cartridges. A busy office will spend far more on ink cartridges and paper per year than they spend on printers – and at a better margin for HP.
  • Combine the two prior points to leverage the new model.
    • Lease or provide the equipment at just above cost, in exchange for a contract commitment to purchase the consumable for a defined period.
    • Triple the cost of the consumable over time!
    • This should provide a more profitable and sustainable model. Adjust the cost of the ink upwards so that it pays. On a per-piece basis, the consumable at 3x or 4x current cost will still be a miniscule part of overall product cost. Further, the buyer won’t have to amortize the cost of the equipment over their production, making this an attractive option.
    • Concentrate on equipment design and outsource the manufacturing on a modular basis while keeping control of the one or two most critical components.

[like]

How Do You Plan for Patent Expiration? Six Suggestions

Situation: A company is facing the expiration of the principal patent for its main product. There are subsidiary patents which still have life. Currently, there are no competing products, but several companies understand the technology. How do you plan for patent expiration?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Think of this as a two-step process:
    • Step 1 – Step back and look at what the company has:
      • Patents – including the claims that have been awarded on all company patents.
      • Facilities – capable of manufacturing current products, but also additional products, perhaps with a minimum of additional equipment.
      • People – competent staff running manufacturing operations, and tight office operations.
    • Step 2 – Loot at where the company could go and evaluate the markets where the existing technology is applicable:
      • Work with outside, imaginative people who can take a fresh look at the options.
  • Looks carefully at the claims in all the company’s patents.
    • What do they cover?
    • Is there an opportunity to extend current claims through process patents?
    • Caveat: a company can file for a process patent on anything that has been for sale on the market for less than a year. However, if they have been selling a product covered by this application for more than a year, they cannot.
  • Look at other markets – companies that could license the company’s technology, or with whom the company could partner to provide new consumer-oriented products:
    • Is there inexpensive, affordable equipment that would enable the company to produce additional products in the current location?
  • Think outside the box: what business is the company in? Think more broadly than the current market about where high value opportunities exist. These can be low to medium volume, high price/margin or high-volume lower price/margin.
  • Patents are not the only protection – trade secrets also work. 3M’s primary IP strategy, particularly on their adhesives, etc. is through trade secret – both for low and high-volume products.
  • “Product” patent extensions have limited utility. They are easy to design around. “Process” patents have more utility. These can be licensed at low cost per application in high volume applications and provide a nice royalty reserve stream.

[like]

How Do You Manage Through a Difficult Period? Six Solutions

Situation: The CEO of a company is wrestling with issues concerning change orders and high labor and materials cost. To get back into good financial shape, they are considering options including reduction in estimator time and selling equipment; however, either of these could gut the business. How do you manage through a difficult period?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • It is critical to get on top of change orders. This is potentially a big profit-loss swing for the business.
    • Does everyone understand what’s happening?
    • If the answer is yes, teach them more about the business nuts and bolts so that they can help develop solutions? Share a portion of the savings in the form of spot bonuses for those who develop solutions.
  • Take a lesson from The Great Game of Business. Let employees know about the challenges and challenge them to help develop solutions.
    • As an example, look at change orders and the percent of change orders that are not correctly completed, approved and invoiced as a critical number. Let’s say that 50% of change orders are not completed, approved and/or invoiced correctly. The objective for the year is to reduce this to 25%. Calculate the value of lost billings from the past year. If this can be reduced by half, the value will be $X. If the company can meet this objective, consider making half of $X available for distribution as gifts or prizes.
    • To support this, allow each new project to design its own minigame to reduce the number of incomplete and uninvoiced change orders.
    • The idea is to have the project and inside teams design the minigames and come up with ways to reduce incomplete and uninvoiced change orders. They will learn new ways of being more efficient from this process. This is the long-term benefit to the company.
  • If it is necessary to reduce staff, cut early instead of later. This is painful but laid-off employees can be hired back on a contract basis as necessary.
  • A common solution during a difficult period is to cut back to core, reducing overhead as a survival strategy, and focus on winning as may bids as possible to rebuild the business.
    • Look at all departments and the gross margin that each produces minus the overhead that each requires. Focus cutbacks on those that are not positive.
  • Increase annuity contracts – contracts with major companies that are growing and frequently require the company’s services.
  • Transfer equipment to a separate corporation. Lease it back as business requires. This increases cash flow flexibility – for example, don’t make lease payments when cash is tight.

[like]

Where Should a Company Focus – People or Cash? Four Thoughts

Situation: A small company sells consumables as its primary source of revenue and profit, and produces equipment associated with these consumables. Their challenge is that designing and producing equipment is beyond their financial capacity. They have a small, loyal staff engaged in equipment production. This is a critical trade-off that must be resolved. Where should the company focus – people or cash?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • This product/profit combination is common. HP sells printers and ink, as well as other products, but ink cartridges have long been their primary source of corporate profit. The question is how to produce the associated equipment at the lowest cost?
  • Given the shortage of financial resources, why not asks a company with expertise in equipment to build the equipment on a contract basis?
    • Offer the outsource company the designs and expertise to support the project. That company may even hire your employees who have developed expertise in this area.
    • In return for providing design and guidance, ask the contract company for a percentage of the revenue or profit on equipment that they sell. This relieves you of the payroll and cash obligations for the equipment, and provides you with a modest income stream from equipment sales.
  • There is an obvious question of how the small company retains its intellectual property position. Is it possible to look at critical sub-assemblies and retain the expertise within the smaller company to complete and install some of these?
    • If so, this will boost annual revenue. The contract partner completes all but the most critical pieces, and the small company finishes the product with its technology.
  • The small company, through its sales and marketing efforts, should maintain control of leads and sales of both equipment and consumables.

[like]

How Do You Evaluate Strategic Options? Three Suggestions

Situation: A company has developed and shipped equipment that puts it into a new market. They can continue to pursue this direction or make a significant shift that will open up a larger opportunity. What are the most important considerations to this decision?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • There are a number of points that you need to clarify before making this decision:
    • What is the magnitude of difference between the two opportunities?
    • How much of a shift in technology is required to make the jump to the larger segment?
    • How much of the expertise to make this shift do you have in-house, and how much must you bring in, acquire or develop through partnerships?
    • What is your most likely exit strategy and how will each opportunity impact it?
  • Are you being realistic in your ability to meet development timelines?
    • If you don’t have deep expertise in the area that you want to develop, the answer is most likely yes. If you do you can often beat your initial estimates.
    • If the shift includes both there is risk that you will underestimate the time required to develop both the prototype and to turn the prototype into production quality technology.
  • If your ultimate objective is to sell the company, be aware that selling any company can be tricky, and you may not be able to sell the company for the value that you need to support yourself after the sale.
    • Study other companies in your geography and market, and determine both the price that they received for their companies and how they positioned their companies for sale.
    • As an alternative to selling, consider hiring a general manager to run the company. This can free you to concentrate on your passion and also increase the value of the company if you decide to sell at a future date.

Key Words: Strategy, Technology, Equipment, Market, Decision, Opportunity, Expertise, Timeline, Exit, Value, Sale, Positioning, Manager

[like]