Situation: A company is facing the expiration of the principal patent for its main product. There are subsidiary patents which still have life. Currently, there are no competing products, but several companies understand the technology. How do you plan for patent expiration?
Advice from the CEOs:
- Think of this as a two-step process:
- Step 1 – Step back and look at what the company has:
- Patents – including the claims that have been awarded on all company patents.
- Facilities – capable of manufacturing current products, but also additional products, perhaps with a minimum of additional equipment.
- People – competent staff running manufacturing operations, and tight office operations.
- Step 2 – Loot at where the company could go and evaluate the markets where the existing technology is applicable:
- Work with outside, imaginative people who can take a fresh look at the options.
- Looks carefully at the claims in all the company’s patents.
- What do they cover?
- Is there an opportunity to extend current claims through process patents?
- Caveat: a company can file for a process patent on anything that has been for sale on the market for less than a year. However, if they have been selling a product covered by this application for more than a year, they cannot.
- Look at other markets – companies that could license the company’s technology, or with whom the company could partner to provide new consumer-oriented products:
- Is there inexpensive, affordable equipment that would enable the company to produce additional products in the current location?
- Think outside the box: what business is the company in? Think more broadly than the current market about where high value opportunities exist. These can be low to medium volume, high price/margin or high-volume lower price/margin.
- Patents are not the only protection – trade secrets also work. 3M’s primary IP strategy, particularly on their adhesives, etc. is through trade secret – both for low and high-volume products.
- “Product” patent extensions have limited utility. They are easy to design around. “Process” patents have more utility. These can be licensed at low cost per application in high volume applications and provide a nice royalty reserve stream.
[like]