Tag Archives: Impact

What are Appropriate Social/Personal Interactions at Work? Three Points

Situation: A new CEO has been promoted from within the ranks of a small-to-medium sized company. He was told by the board that the promotion was based on exemplary performance and the feeling that he was ready for this responsibility. He’s been with the company for many years and has developed close relationships with co-workers. How will the promotion impact those relationships? What are appropriate social and personal interactions at work?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Consider three cases:
    • Case 1 – Even though two individuals may be friends outside of work, they do not engage as “friends” at work. There is a different role structure at work.
    • Case 2 – Coaching of children as an example: though two individuals have a friendship or close relationship outside of work, for example frequently playing golf or another sport, favoritism should not be shown toward this individual at work. Preserve the veil of trust with the other employees.
    • Case 3 – A CEO often has lunch with employees, but no other social activity outside of work. This individual often expresses a personal interest in others’ families and their families, interests and hobbies. This person takes the time to show that he or she cares about employees.
  • Just as was the case between the new CEO and the prior CEO, there is a natural distance between any employee and those individuals who evaluate or review them. The evaluators or reviewers have a power over the employee that prevents them from approaching each other as true peers.
    • Because of this natural barrier, do not try for force social or personal interactions. The best that one can do is to make sure that the others know that the CEO cares about them, has their interests in mind, and shows an interest in their families, interests and hobbies.
    • It is important to take advantage of opportunities to demonstrate an interest in others.
  • The person who asked the question mentioned the success of the CFO in building relationships with others in the office. If invited, attend these same functions. Observe and learn from the CFO’s interactions with the others. Model the CFO’s interactions but add your own individuality to this modeling. Most of all, listen actively, and patiently allow the interactions to mature. Don’t force things.

[like]

What Can be Learned from Employee Departures? Five Observations

Situation: A company has recently seen the departure of several younger employees. Reasons given were better offers at other companies. These employees have been replaced by what appears to be better talent. The CEO took these departures personally and is concerned about the impact on the departments of those who departed. What can be learned from employee departures?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • In working with Millennial employees, it may be necessary to lower your expectations in terms of employee loyalty, work ethic and longevity. Millennials have a different perspective. Recognize this and build expectations around it.
  • Be frank with new employees up front. Plan their career progression out 36 to 48 months and let them know that this time will give them great training. If they are interested in the company and career progression beyond this, then the company be open to discussing options with them.
  • Use outside resources to do a 2–3-month post-op on those who left, as well as to help monitor employee attitudes on an ongoing basis.
    • The outside resource can conduct interviews by telephone, on a confidential basis. The objective will be to assess the reasons why the employees left once the emotions of the action have died down. Summary results of the interviews will not identify the past employee. This will prompt them to be frank with their feedback.
    • Similarly, use an outside resource to conduct confidential telephone interviews with random current employees on a periodic basis. Let the employees know that they will be contacted by an outside agency on a random basis, and that their responses will be confidential. The purpose is to gain information on how the company can better address employee needs in the work environment. Only aggregated and summary results will be presented to the company.
    • These actions will help to assess whether the departures were an extraordinary event or an early warning of more systemic challenges within the workforce.
  • The increased salary needs of those who left may be symptomatic of the current economic conditions.
    • Currently, the need of companies to attract talent has increased pressure to raise wages. Along with this and there is increased turnover among employees who believe that they can make more elsewhere. There is little that can be done to run a sensible business while trying to keep up with current salary demands.
    • Most companies who survive successive boom and bust cycles do not respond to wage pressure, knowing that each boom will be followed by a bust.
    • Once the next bust sets in, wage demands will go down until the next boom cycle starts.
  • Should anything to mitigate the impact of employee departure on their departments?
    • Keep ears open for any sign of an ongoing impact.
    • As above, consider an outside resource to check the temperature of the employees.
    • The best mitigation may be a strong integration of the new, energetic R&D employees into the team.

[like]

How Do You Address Employee Departures? Four Points

Situation: A CEO is concerned that three members of the R&D Team recently left the company. All were in their late 20s and were close. All three cited receiving better offers from another company. They have been replaced by what the company considers better talent. The CEO is concerned about the impact of this turnover on company morale and performance. How do you address employee departures?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • In working with Gen Y through Millennial employees, it may be necessary to adjust expectations in terms of employee loyalty, work ethic and longevity. Younger generations have a different perspective. Learn from this and adjust expectations accordingly.
  • Be frank with new employees up front. Plan their career progression out 36 to 48 months, and during this time give them great training. If they are interested in the company and career progression beyond this, discuss options with them.
  • Use outside resources to do a 2–3-month post-op on the three who left, as well as to help monitor employee attitudes on an ongoing basis.
    • The outside resource can conduct interviews by telephone, on a confidential basis, to assess the reasons why the employees left once emotions have died down. This resource should only provide summaries of the interviews without identifying which past employee said what. This will prompt them to be frank about their feedback. This can yield valuable lessons.
    • Similarly, use an outside resource to conduct confidential telephone interviews with random current employees on a periodic basis. Let employees know that they will be contacted by an outside agency on a random basis, and that their responses will be confidential. The purpose is to better respond to employee needs in the work environment. This will help to assess whether the departures were an extraordinary event or whether they are an early warning of more systemic challenges within the workforce.
  • The increased salary requests of those who left may be symptomatic of a “boom and bust” economy.
    • When things are heating up, and through an employment peak, there is increased pressure to raise wages, accompanies by increased turnover among employees who believe that they can make more elsewhere.
    • Most companies who are able to survive successive boom and bust cycles do not respond to the wage pressure, knowing that each boom is followed by a bust. Those who inflate their wages to keep up often end up dying during the bust.

[like]

How Will Your Personal Plans Impact the Company? Six Points

Situation: A CEO, for personal reasons, is planning to move to another state. While he will remain CEO, he is concerned about the potential impact of this decision on the company, particularly the fact that he will not be present personally to handle matters that arise. What can he do to alleviate this concern? How will your personal plans impact the company?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Put a stake in the ground. Set a date for the move and work backwards to see whether this is attainable.
  • Have a discussion with the company’s key managers.
    • Empower them to challenge the date.
    • Discuss this as a brainstorm to plan the future and what must be done to get there. Once a plan is established retest the timing.
  • Consider this as a gradual transition. Start 3 weeks here / 1 week there, and gradually transition to 1/3. This will help you to determine how the company performs absent the CEO’s daily presence.
    • Move family but keep a small place here. Start the transition now and figure out balance. Do what is necessary.
  • Have the key managers transition their roles before initiating the move.
    • This will provide confidence that they can handle this transition.
  • As part of the process, look at areas where the company can use more support. For example, is HR up to snuff? What about information services or financial management? Prior to initiating the transition take steps to fill any gaps.
  • Does the company have a formal metrics structure?
    • If not, establish one and in preparation for the transition see how the two managers manage this.

[like]

How Do You Handle Open Issues from a Sale Agreement? Three Thoughts

Situation: A CEO has closed the sale of a significant company property. Due diligence was completed and was satisfactory, but the purchaser now wants to renegotiate the price. The CEO is concerned that if she yields on the price, the buyer will come up with additional changes that will further disadvantage the sale. How do you handle open issues from a sale agreement?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • One member had a similar issue following the sale of a previous company. The decision was that the price at the time of close was the price. The buyer had full opportunity to perform due diligence which would have uncovered any open issues. Condition at time of sale is “buyer beware,” which is why they were allowed a full due diligence.
  • The sale was “as is” including assumption of current debt on the property. It appears that the advantages to the buyer that are anticipated through the purchase will more than offset the impact of the existing debt. As a result, the buyer is, on balance, better off than they had anticipated. Thus, there is no need to yield on price.
  • On the timing of events that may not occur – an indirect cost audit by the company’s prime agency should this be necessary – there is a question of the financial impact to the company.
    • There is a default date on the final payment that could be held up by the negotiation, but the impact is not significant to the company.
    • Otherwise, the company’s interests are covered by the sale agreement.

[like]

How Do You Evaluate Management Team Performance? Four Points

Situation: As the end of the year approaches, a CEO is evaluating management performance over the year. An area of focus during the year have been evaluating new business opportunities and the impact of these on the company. The CEO has been uncomfortable with disagreements between departments which have slowed opportunity evaluations. How do you evaluate management team performance?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Breaking down issues of concern, there are two areas of focus.
    • Problems that should have been resolved by two people have required a referee (the CEO) to mediate the solution because the two parties could not work things out themselves.
    • Individuals who are otherwise highly skilled have become overly sensitive about minor issues that have prevented them from developing their own solutions
  • The most important step is to have the management team agree on a protocol for dealing with new business opportunities and the impact of new sales opportunities on development and support. A protocol will help to avoid the two issues of concern that have been identified.
    • Direct the team to come up with a protocol that they all agree to, subject to CEO review.
    • Once it is finalized, announce it with great fanfare as the new process that will guide the company. Make it mandatory.
    • Support this process with daily (short – 10-15 minute) or weekly (longer but 1 hour or less) team meetings to anticipate and remove blocks to execution.
  • Tension between sales, service and engineering are natural and healthy. This is because each is driven by different priorities, all of which are necessary to serve the customer.
    • Resolution of this tension requires a turnkey handoff protocol, involving checklists and flow charts.
    • The best protocols are not imposed on people but are developed by the people involved. This gives them ownership, and a stake in implementing and maintaining the protocol.
  • If, despite everyone’s best efforts there is ongoing dysfunction, it may be necessary to replace difficult people. As challenging as this seems, those who report to difficult top managers likely experience similar difficulties with them. Organizations often respond with relief after leadership eliminates a difficult manager.

[like]

How Do you Evaluate a New Opportunity? Five Views

Situation: A CEO has been approached about new opportunity. The company has been through some hard times, and the opportunity offers access to quick cash which would remedy the company’s debt exposure. A downside is that the deal would erode the company’s brand exposure because it would operate under another brand. How do you evaluate a new opportunity?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Carefully evaluate how this opportunity will impact current operations.
    • What percent of time and effort will the opportunity require? Will it compromise the company’s current operations?
    • The appeal is access to quick cash. However, if the bottom line isn’t sufficient to meet the company’s needs, walk away.
    • Given that the project would be under another brand, why not spend the time and resources growing the company’s brand?
  • Is there anything that could make the opportunity more appealing?
    • See if the other company is open to offering a piece of the business after a period of commitment.
    • Management control. Assure that the company’s principals would have the autonomy to make it work.
    • The ability to keep the company’s name visible and prominently cited in all joint projects.
  • Look at this opportunity the same way that the company evaluates other opportunities.
    • Opportunity to build brand presence.
    • Assure that the proposed project meets the company’s current rates of return, or if not at least the current dollar return per project.
  • Is this a way to get into larger projects more quickly with reduced risk? If so, negotiate this into the deal.
  • Bottom line:
    • The company is emerging from hard times nicely.
    • The company is building a strong brand and reputation in its target geography.
    • Stay the course and trust in the company’s abilities.
    • Take on projects from this new opportunity only if they help build the company’s brand and reputation with less risk than is currently carried.
    • There is no reason to entertain this opportunity if it reduces the company’s brand equity and/or carries the same or more risk than the company’s current project mix.

[like]

What are the Key Points to Make in an Investor Presentation? Three Views

Situation: A CEO wants to raise money to expand the company. Target investors will be private equity investors with a minimum investment threshold of $10 million. What are the key points to make in an investor presentation?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • To demonstrate the company valuation, and the potential increase in value to investors, calculate the EBITDA trend for the last 3-4 years and project it out for the next 5 years.
    • The valuation is the whole company – not just the investment piece.
    • Show the increase in exit valuation with and without the target investment. Show impact.
    • Show revenue and EBITDA on the company’s current trend and what this will become with the investment.
  • An alternate view: Don’t focus on valuation. The company is profitable and growing. Pitch the plan and the financials associated with the plan. Let the potential investor come back with an investment proposal and terms. KISS – Keep It Simple Silly – take all the risk out.
  • There are periodic Shake the Money Tree events in Silicon Valley, sponsored by SVASE – Silicon Valley Association of Startup Entrepreneurs. Start attending these.
    • Ask for advice – not money. There is an adage in Silicon Valley is that if you ask for money you get advice; whereas if you ask for advice you get money.
    • There’s a subtle difference between the two asks. The point is that potential investors don’t just want to invest money. They want to be involved in the decisions as to how the company spends that money. By asking for advice, a potential investee demonstrates that they respect the opinions and input of potential investors and will listen to them.

[like]

How Do You Implement a Process Change? Six Suggestions

Situation: The CEO of a service company is concerned about lost income from uncaptured billing. He has identified the cause – failure to capture extra hours that haven’t been billed – but is struggling to get employees to monitor this more effectively. How do you implement a process change?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The group presented two options for growth: bring in experienced outside people to develop additional systems to run the company, or a hybrid model using internal resources, augmented with outside expertise.
  • Bring in Experienced Outside Resources: Hire an experienced outsider with a track record in your industry to design and implement the needed systems.
    • Pros for this solution: the outsider will bring a fresh vision and new energy, plus the experience and know-how to make the desired changes.
    • Cons: impact on current business culture. This may generate resentment among employees who can no longer make decisions on the spot and may remove a path to management for existing staff. Possible negative impact on customers who receive larger bills due to change orders.
  • Hybrid Model: Outside person creates model and trains employees to implement it, then monitors the system and progress long-term. The key is to change expectations and behavior within the team.
    • Pros for this solution: more opportunity for current employee participation; involves employees in the design of the system, providing better buy-in to the solution.
    • Cons: as with any change, this won’t provide the full expected return. Just the fact that things are being changed impacts the efficiency of implementation. Unanticipated blocks and resistance may hinder progress – don’t be surprised by this, it is predictable.
  • Implement SOPs that facilitate rapid response to change orders – starting now and with whichever option is chosen.
  • Generate a pick list of all possible change orders with pre-calculated costs to guide employee choices and keep customers informed.
  • Whatever solution is chosen, be sure to communicate frequently and consistently with employees to facilitate the change.

[like]

How Do You Balance Core and New Businesses? Five Guidelines

Situation: A company has built a solid core business and wants to expand its product portfolio by adding new business. Core functions can serve both existing and new business, reducing overhead on individual businesses. What pitfalls must the company avoid? How do you balance core and new businesses?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • New business activity cannot impact core business. The core business is the company’s bread and butter. It is important to make this clear to both employees and clients and to structure the handling of new business opportunities accordingly.
  • From a staffing standpoint, new business opportunities cannot impact marketing, service and operations staff supporting the core business. New business development activity and operations cannot result in a pull from their focus on the core business. This separation may be facilitated by placing the staff supporting new business in separate facilities, or in an area separate from the staff supporting core business.
  • In the case of support functions that will serve both existing and new business, recruit and hire staff to support the new business to assure that both existing and new business receive proper support.
  • Hire a new person, one with experience and contacts, to develop the new business opportunities. Look for a sales person who can bring in significant new business. This will pay for the individual quickly.
  • How does leadership communicate these changes to staff?
    • Meet with key managers to identify potential concerns. These may include impact on company culture and client focus. Use the responses gathered to develop a communication plan to allay employee concerns.
    • As new business opportunities are added, it will be necessary to bring in new, experienced personnel. Previously, the company brought in experienced personnel to build the current business. Be open and up-front about this and explain that as the company grows there will be new opportunities for existing employees.
    • The company’s objective is to improve the quality of the organization and to raise the boat for all. Current owners and managers will automatically benefit from the efforts of new people to expand the business.
    • Building new business opportunities as separate businesses diversifies the company and reduces the risk of overdependence on existing clients and key vendor relationships. This enhances the job security of current employees.

[like]