Category Archives: Strategy

How Do You Handle Open Issues from a Sale Agreement? Three Thoughts

Situation: A CEO has closed the sale of a significant company property. Due diligence was completed and was satisfactory, but the purchaser now wants to renegotiate the price. The CEO is concerned that if she yields on the price, the buyer will come up with additional changes that will further disadvantage the sale. How do you handle open issues from a sale agreement?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • One member had a similar issue following the sale of a previous company. The decision was that the price at the time of close was the price. The buyer had full opportunity to perform due diligence which would have uncovered any open issues. Condition at time of sale is “buyer beware,” which is why they were allowed a full due diligence.
  • The sale was “as is” including assumption of current debt on the property. It appears that the advantages to the buyer that are anticipated through the purchase will more than offset the impact of the existing debt. As a result, the buyer is, on balance, better off than they had anticipated. Thus, there is no need to yield on price.
  • On the timing of events that may not occur – an indirect cost audit by the company’s prime agency should this be necessary – there is a question of the financial impact to the company.
    • There is a default date on the final payment that could be held up by the negotiation, but the impact is not significant to the company.
    • Otherwise, the company’s interests are covered by the sale agreement.

[like]

What are the Options for Your Next Phase? Six Suggestions

Situation: It’s a new year, and a CEO is thinking through options for the coming year and beyond. She has decided to leave her company and establish a new role and career for herself. Immediate concerns are funding the transition and entry into a new career. What are the options for your next phase?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The area that can be built most quickly to provide income is a consulting practice based on the experience developed as a CEO and as a specialist leveraging past experience. Building a new practice is a big commitment. Make this the initial focus and get a few gigs to get the ball rolling. The company is an early option, as well as some of their key customers. These relationships are already in place.
  • On the academic side, investigate Executive Education programs in Business Schools. Here the clientele is different from normal undergraduate and postgraduate education – actively working managers and executives. For this audience the combination of experience as a CEO and academic credentials is advantageous. For this audience, a lack of credentialed teaching experience is largely counterbalanced by the weight of professional experience.
  • The Professor / Consultant track looks best if established as a 5-year plan.
  • While getting established in a new role there will be an initial challenge managing the time demands of teaching, research and developing a consulting practice. Think of this as managing the multiple functions of a company. It will be important to establish early priorities to accomplish the desired plan.
  • A professorship does not necessarily tie financially to current goals but can be an important strategic adjunct to consulting efforts. In a certain sense, teaching will have to be its own reward.
  • To the extent possible and depending upon how the board responds to the decision to leave the company negotiate the best possible severance package. This can tie into some of the suggestions, above.

[like]

How Do You Create Larger Deal Sizes? Six Options

Situation: A company has good deal flow, but the CEO finds that margins are significantly increased with larger deals. Larger deals reduce the overhead component, much of which is the same regardless of deal size. The company is dominant in their market and can provide multi-site and multinational services. How do you create larger deal sizes?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • One company with multiple consulting contracts has found that bidding for RFPs on larger projects has opened the door to larger contracts..
  • Another company has looked at cost of sales and its contribution to business wins. .
    • Under 6% was ineffective and over 12% did not generate significantly more business. Their target win ratio is 30%
    • Factors that positively influenced win ratios were positioning the company as the preferred bidder up-front, and avoiding sham RFPs which are already slotted in favor of a competitor that helped to spec the RFP:
  • When bidding on RFPs, if the company will not be the low bidder it is important to identify the critical non-price parameters where the company will offer a differential advantage.
    • Focus on large multi-site or international RFPs which are more likely to be larger dollar RFPs.
    • Look at supply chain management opportunities.
    • Offer to warrant results in exchange for a higher price.
    • Look at system-type opportunities where the company can offer a more comprehensive solution based on its depth and experience.
    • Look for situations where the company can develop an advantaged position.
  • What are the implications of these strategies?
    • It will require retraining the inside sales force to research and qualify RFPs.
    • It will shift the focus to project vs. outsourcing opportunities. The latter are more price and availability driven and don’t play to the company’s strengths.
  • Explore channel sales through the existing partner network.
    • Offer a referral fee to regionals for referring opportunities outside their scope. In return, hire them as subs on the project.
  • Take a look at the big engineering firms who work multinational contracts, and handle their mitigation matters with small teams.
    • Offer them a comprehensive approach that is less expensive, more consistent, and more visible than their current self-service approach.

[like]

How Do You Take Advantage of a New Technology? Two Foci

Situation: A company has had early success with a promising new technology that compliments the company’s strategic direction. Their objective is to become one of the top suppliers and servicers of this technology in their service area. How do you take advantage of a new technology?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Leverage the company’s strengths to create an early advantage in this technology.
    • Create a low-cost delivery system to take advantage of opportunities available through this technology initially at a lower margin, then offer enhancements to build margin to company norms.
    • Investigate other markets and applications where this low-cost delivery system can generate you new opportunities.
  • It is early to assess whether the new technology will become dominant, or just the latest fad. It has been on the market for less than two years and is just taking off.
    • Take the next few months to dig into what is happening within vendors of the technology, and how they are perceived by their client companies.
    • Talk to CIOs about their perceptions of the technology based on the last few quarters of experience – quality of implementation, quality of service. Other providers add a layer to the cost – is the service worth the cost or do client companies save over time through overhead reduction?
    • Talk to other vendors from other market areas – learn from their experience selling and working with the technology.
    • How do the other vendors make money? Are costs to their corporate clients offset by savings implementing the technology? What margins are the others enjoying and does this come from the initial technology, from add-on services, or complimentary sales. What is the perception of the sustainability of this technology both within the providers and to the CIOs? What about the technology really irks corporate clients? Where is the soft underbelly of this technology? Research may assist in making future decisions on how to approach the technology and clients.

[like]

How Do You Shift the Sales Mix? Five Suggestions

Situation: The CEO of a professional services company wants to shift the focus of the company from emphasis on service of existing customers to new customer development. Historically they have counted on repeat sales, but these have lagged. The CEO wants to develop new customers to build current and future revenue. This is a mentality shift. How do you shift the sales mix?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The objective is to move the current customer to new customer mix from 80/20 toward 40/60.
    • As an example, the CEO has shifted her focus day to day management to long-term planning and strategy over the last two years.
    • Now it’s time to motivate others to make a similar shift in customer development.
  • Make the shift to sales – to rain-maker – a requirement for Partner Track. Let those who want to pursue Partner Track know that this is a key part of their qualification for Partner.
  • Make cash flow analysis an integral part of new project proposals and current project tracking. Have project managers devise their project analyses to show return but review these to assure that their analyses are accurate. Require them to sell their analyses to the Partners. This will help them to see the value of correctly bidding new projects up-front.
  • Ask them – what do you want to be doing in 10 years? How will you be contributing to the goals of the firm? What are you doing to get there? Communicate the critical metrics that will be evaluated: sales, new account development, profitable bids and project cost control. Focus cost control on keeping options presented under control and minimizing rework.
  • Reserve Partner Track for those who can produce both sales and effective delivery of services. In employee reviews make this distinction clear.

[like]

What Do You Manage as You Adapt to Market Conditions? Four Points

Situation: A company is in the process of adjusting its customer and business focus in response to changing market conditions. Gross margin on projects that have been the company mainstay in the past have fallen significantly. The CEO is evaluating different adjustments to address this. What do you manage as you adapt to market conditions?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The company’s business model is shifting from a staffing agency to a product development model. This means that the business must be driven by a different set of parameters and metrics:
    • A different time/utilization mix.
    • Different personnel – the company needs managers.
    • Changes to the organizational chart and incentives.
  • How does the company currently charge clients for Project Management?
    • Currently it is time and materials.
    • Consider charging on a percent of project cost basis. For example, 15% of total project cost. The pitch will be that the client will be able to reduce the overall cost of the project – ideally in both dollars and time – and that the company will have increased accountability for delivering these results.
  • How will this impact the company’s cash position? How will the company retain adequate cash flow during the transition?
    • The current cash position is 4 months of projected monthly cash plus receivables.
    • If there is drop to 3 months, flag a yellow caution light.
    • Two months becomes a red light.
    • What is the backstop if the company runs shy – if, for example, some engineers are not very active? In this case, will deferral of unpaid vacation time and other options allow the company to survive without further draining cash? Have a meeting with key managers to evaluate the impact of this option.
  • Consider looking at competitors for possible collaborations. This can be delicate because they may want to steal the company’s personnel and there are other risks, but sometimes promising deals can be arranged.

[like]

How Do You Create a Succession Plan? Three Points

Situation: A CEO, planning for his future, wants to create a succession plan. Done correctly, this should also promote the growth of the company until it is time for him to retire. The challenge is that the company is highly decentralized, and a clear successor has yet to be identified. How do you create a succession plan?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Tie succession planning to growth. This will benefit the company whether the CEO’s retirement is in the planning horizon or the more distant future.
    • Consider geographic transfers to provide growth opportunity for key managers and to proliferate the success of highly successful regions into less successful regions.
    • Develop a leadership generation engine. Consider GE as a model for this as noted in Jim Collins’s books Good to Great and its predecessor, Built to Last. GE’s success is a model for building long-lasting value substantially beyond the current value of the company.
    • Create a vision of what the company could be and the organization chart to fulfill this vision. This will guide and support the two points, above.
  • As new talent is acquired, conduct this with an eye to growth.
    • As the company identifies and hires top prospects, conduct the hiring process to fill the organization chart of the future company that is envisioned.
    • Look at outside hires for growth positions to complement home grown talent.
    • If business or company acquisitions are being considered, be aware that the leadership of the acquired business or company and its top talent may depart. Include retention clauses and incentives in any acquisition contract.
  • This effort must be approached as a long-term development process – it does not happen through quick-fixes but through a commitment to excellence in acquiring and developing talent.

[like]

How Do You Grow Knowledge Workers into Servant Leaders? Three Methods

Situation: A company’s staff is made up primarily of knowledge workers. These are highly skilled individuals who excel in their roles. The CEO wishes to shift their focus to servant leadership – where the focus is the growth and development of the company. How do you grow knowledge workers into servant leaders?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • One option is to create a different set of incentives. Offering key managers the option to invest in and hold shares in the company will change their perspective. This, in turn, can change their behavior because servant leadership will improve company performance and the value of their shares.
  • Another option, used by Accenture and many Fortune 500s, is to hire a lot of the best and brightest individuals that they can find out of college and see who rises to the top.
    • The ratio in large firms is generally 15 hires to produce 1 high performer. Another CEO at the table is now shifting to this model at his company.
    • Create an entry level position for recent graduates that will allow for this sifting without disrupting the company’s culture.
    • Speed identification and retention of the best talent through annual evaluations of the company’s talent. This includes ratings by employees’ supervisors of both how the individual is doing and their ultimate potential within the company.
    • Be aware of the downsides to this model. One is that the two groups that tend to leave of their own accord are the best and the worst employees.
  • A third option is to create two career tracks within the Company.
    • One track is upwardly mobile. This is the track that identifies, develops and grooms future servant leaders.
    • The other track is a specialty track, which can produce servant leaders along a different dimension – breadth of experience and expertise in key skills of value to the firm.
    • This second track also allows for growth, characterized by levels of title, salary and recognition that reward the acquisition and perfection of skills in key disciplines.
    • Several “kinder, gentler” environments such as 3M have used parallel tracks with great success.

[like]

How Do You Focus on Doing Things Right? Seven Recommendations

Situation: A CEO is concerned that her company is not as efficient or effective as it could be. Of the key activities where the company is focused, few have any obvious connection to the customer or the customers’ needs. How do you focus on doing things right?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Create a set of cost graphs to parallel the company’s revenue graphs. If these are put side by side, does it indicate that the company is doing some things that add relatively low value and profit? What happens if resources are shifted away from less valuable activity?
  • Concentrate resources on doing one profitable thing well. Become best in class at this one thing. This may both increase the value of the firm and help to focus future development.
  • Bring in a senior level marketing research person or marketing manager with marketing research experience to determine what the customer wants, how should the company compete, and what current customers may be willing to pay for its software.
  • Strengthen the primary product – it represents 90% of sales. This is where the company has the best understanding of both its customers and the market. Look at what it takes to become enterprise wide with the company’s largest customers. Expand vertical capabilities and build $1 million accounts to $5 million a year.
  • The company already has a diverse group of clients, many of whom are huge.
    • How deep is the company in each of these clients? It may be easier and less expensive from a sales standpoint to go deeper into these clients than to bring on new clients.
    • Look for ways to make current $1 million clients $5 million clients by selling what the company currently sell to more of their divisions and locations.
    • The key to executing this strategy is to listen closely to what clients’ needs are and adjust or customize the offering to better meet their needs.
  • Focus on solutions and reduce the cost of solution implementation. Consider becoming more vertical in one key implementation and become the best at that.
  • Create a relevant framework for the company’s strategy. For what purpose is it necessary to do the right thing? If the purpose is to exit in 2 to 3 years, this yields a very different strategy than if the objective to dominate the company’s market in a 5 to10 year period.

[like]

How Do you Evaluate a New Opportunity? Five Views

Situation: A CEO has been approached about new opportunity. The company has been through some hard times, and the opportunity offers access to quick cash which would remedy the company’s debt exposure. A downside is that the deal would erode the company’s brand exposure because it would operate under another brand. How do you evaluate a new opportunity?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Carefully evaluate how this opportunity will impact current operations.
    • What percent of time and effort will the opportunity require? Will it compromise the company’s current operations?
    • The appeal is access to quick cash. However, if the bottom line isn’t sufficient to meet the company’s needs, walk away.
    • Given that the project would be under another brand, why not spend the time and resources growing the company’s brand?
  • Is there anything that could make the opportunity more appealing?
    • See if the other company is open to offering a piece of the business after a period of commitment.
    • Management control. Assure that the company’s principals would have the autonomy to make it work.
    • The ability to keep the company’s name visible and prominently cited in all joint projects.
  • Look at this opportunity the same way that the company evaluates other opportunities.
    • Opportunity to build brand presence.
    • Assure that the proposed project meets the company’s current rates of return, or if not at least the current dollar return per project.
  • Is this a way to get into larger projects more quickly with reduced risk? If so, negotiate this into the deal.
  • Bottom line:
    • The company is emerging from hard times nicely.
    • The company is building a strong brand and reputation in its target geography.
    • Stay the course and trust in the company’s abilities.
    • Take on projects from this new opportunity only if they help build the company’s brand and reputation with less risk than is currently carried.
    • There is no reason to entertain this opportunity if it reduces the company’s brand equity and/or carries the same or more risk than the company’s current project mix.

[like]