Tag Archives: Minimize

How Do You Balance Scalable Growth with Quality Service? Five Thoughts

Situation: A CEO wants to determine whether and to what extent his company’s service model is scalable. He wants to determine whether it is possible to add additional clients by adjusting the ratio of clients to staff. The tricky part is determining whether the company can increase the client to staff ratio while minimizing the impact on client service. This is critical because client service is the company’s “secret sauce”. How do you balance scalable growth with quality service?

  • Start by profiling the current client base from high to low maintenance. For example, set up a grid with axes of sophistication and frequency of desired contact as follows:
    • A – unsophisticated and desire frequent contact
    • B – sophisticated and desire frequent contact
    • C – unsophisticated and desire infrequent contact
    • D – sophisticated and desire infrequent contact
  • Analyze the client base and assign each current or new client to category A, B, C or D.
  • Distribute client relationships so that no member of the team has too many A’s. This may make it possible to assign more clients to each staff member.
  • Also consider matching staff to client type. Some staff may be better working with unsophisticated clients, while others are more adept with sophisticated clients.
  • As this model is developed and built, try different alternatives for matching staff to clients. This can help to identify additional alternatives for achieving the company’s objective.

[like]

How Do You Optimize the Business Model? Four Suggestions

Situation: A company works on a project basis, and the CEO is concerned that the return per project is too low. She is looking for ways to boost the return per project without substantially increasing project risk. How do you optimize the business model?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • What are the risks and potential upsides surrounding the projects?
    • The principal risk is long-term liability, connected with residual liability following project completion.
    • This risk can be mitigated by purchasing a wrap policy; however, this can cut into the profit generated by the project.
    • It is possible to build scale more quickly with larger projects. The percentage return may be lower, but the dollars can be higher.
  • What are the principal components of the company’s time risk?
    • Higher cost of money and greater exposure to fluctuations in prices and interest rates over the project period.
    • This risk can be mitigated using financial derivatives particularly over longer-term projects.
  • How broad is the company’s geographical scope?
    • Currently customers are within a 30-mile radius of the company’s office primarily because company personnel are frequently at the client’s site.
    • This area will broaden as the company’s reputation becomes known.
    • Consider the creation of branch offices to extend the breadth of the company’s service area.
  • What are the key variables that the company faces completing projects?
    • Payment is not received under current contracts until a project is completed.
    • This can be mitigated by creating milestones with payments due at the completion of each milestone.
    • It may be worthwhile sacrificing a level of project profit in return for more frequent payments to boost the company’s cash flow.

[like]

How Do You Add More Discipline to Quotes and Pricing? Four Points

Situation: A CEO faces challenges with clients. The first is vague customer specs because they don’t understand the product. Second is misunderstandings as to timelines. Third is insistence on strict timelines while simultaneously demanding revisions to previous work. How do you add more discipline to quotes and pricing?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Is the company’s technology strategy aligned with its capabilities? Currently the company is trying to build advanced solutions in multiple international markets with a small staff. There does not seem to be the technology or development discipline to convert current capabilities into a sustainable market advantage.
  • For near term focus, because of commitments and milestone payments due from the key customers, focus resources on finishing the last piece of these projects. Once this is done, step back. Look at options and determine the company’s technology strategy moving forward.
    • The key challenge is to define ONE beachhead on which the company will focus and which they can dominate. The objective is to leverage existing engineering creativity to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
    • As this exercise is designed, start with a clean slate. Don’t burden the process with a lot of restrictive assumptions. Consider using an outside facilitator to help facilitate this process.
    • Until this exercise is completed does it really make sense to seek additional work or to commit the company to the next phases with current customers?
  • Once the company has selected and committed to a technology strategy, the decision process becomes different.
    • The objective is to develop laser-like focus on the technology. Minimize distracting the team with other opportunities.
    • It may be OK to lose money on development projects if this work will significantly impact or accelerate the development of the company’s core technology.
  • How does the company justify asking for payment for development for future projects?
    • First, determine and clearly state the company’s technology strategy. Evaluate all future development projects and decisions in terms of their alignment with this strategy.
    • Second, if a particular project is completely aligned with the technology strategy, the company may waive the requirement of payment for development. This, ideally, will be the only exception.
    • Ask for a limited time/scope project to jump start and define new projects. This provides proof of company capabilities and establishes its credibility.
    • If is it necessary to negotiate or bid, start high and bargain down to but not below the best estimate of the cost of development.
    • Remember that deciding what NOT to do or quote is often harder, but just as critical, as deciding what to quote.

[like]