Tag Archives: Factor

How Do You Frame a Make Versus Buy Decision? Two Thoughts

Situation: A CEO is facing a decision whether to make or buy key technology frequently used by the company. What have others done when faced by similar decisions? What are the most important factors that impacted those decisions? How do you frame a make versus buy decision?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • In considering either option evaluate the opportunity by asking whether the technology:
    • Complements the company’s core strategic focus – the company’s “Main Thing” – what you are passionate about, what drives your key economic denominator, and what can you be best at in your market.
    • Supports the key economic denominator – the single factor that has the greatest impact on the company’s profitability and growth.
    • Complements the best use of the company’s critical resources.
    • Protects the company’s process secrets.
    • Feeds your passion as CEO.
  • In evaluating a buy decision look at the strengths of the people who come along with the opportunity.
    • Do they complement the company’s strengths or not?
    • Will they fit the company’s ecology and culture?

[like]

 

How Do You Use Focus and Communication to Strengthen Your Leadership? Three Points

Situation: A CEO is curious about how others have strengthened their leadership skills over time. From discussions with other CEOs she has gathered that focus and communication are important strengths to build. How do you use focus and communication to strengthen your leadership?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Often the process is more important than the actual decision because the process frames how the decision is made.
    • If the process is open to new ideas and approaches, and these are welcomed in the discussion, this can generate both more creative decisions as well as increased buy-in to the ultimate decision being made.
  • One CEO finds that his company is always focused on the outcome. However, he has grown to understand that it is important to frame the decision-making process around your values.
    • Value-based decisions not only generate increased buy-in by all involved, but they strengthen the sense of company culture and values.
  • Another CEO was faced with a personnel issue. She found that by analyzing past decision-making processes company leadership was able to identify a previously unrecognized factors and processes that fed the personnel issue.
    • By addressing the process, the company was able to resolve the issue to the satisfaction of all.

like]

How Do You Improve Infrastructure to Manage Cash Flow? Seven Points

Situation: A CEO wants to improve management of his company’s cash flow. While this is particularly important during times of tight cash and rapidly changing market conditions, the CEO wants to know what others focus on when monitoring cash flow in their companies. How do you improve infrastructure to manage cash flow?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Track project mix and margin contribution both in part and in total. To accomplish this estimate relative contribution margins of different project types.
  • Adjust sales targets and commissions to emphasize projects with higher contribution.
  • Segment the company’s business model by margins, overhead, and cash flow. Set targets and drive focus on profit per “X” (selecting the proper indicators).
  • Analyze contribution per direct cost factor, for example per engineer on payroll.
  • Develop detailed cash budgets on a monthly or even weekly basis when times are uncertain. For example, inflows and outflows by major category tracking actual cash receipt or disbursement.
  • Start with broad projections, and refine the analysis over time as the company better understands the factors that drive cash flow and profitability.
  • As understanding improves, formulate value propositions for salespeople which reflect the most advantageous cash flow contributors of the business.

[like]

How Do You Add a New Capability? Four Approaches

Situation: A CEO reports that customers frequently ask whether the company can deliver a service that isn’t current in their portfolio of capabilities. In a substantial number of cases, the ability to offer this service is a key factor in their choice of vendors. The company’s experience with outside consultants offering this capacity has been disappointing. How do you add a new capability?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Reevaluate the company’s needs and assess whether these can be better meet by bringing this capability in-house, or by restructuring how the company works with contractors. Determine whether the latter is just a negotiation and contract / payment problem.
  • Take a closer look at how the company contracts and creates incentives for outside contractors. Do they have performance objectives written into their contracts that reward them for meeting contract commitments? Can they earn bonuses for beating contract deadlines or exceeding design requirements? Are there penalties them for missing key deadlines?
    • Is it clear whether contractors are missing deadlines because of the “creative process,” because they don’t use their time efficiently, or because they have other commitments that take precedence at the company’s expense?
    • If the answer is either of the two latter situations, then contract adjustments may work. Similarly, if they have an incentive to be more creative faster to meet a bonus deadline a contract adjustment could also work to the company’s benefit.
    • Another option in working with independents is to make it clear that the company is generous, but if the contractor does not meet deadlines, they go to the bottom of the list for future opportunities.
  • An option is to hire one specialist and challenge them to grow a practice within the company. This may mean that they have to do all tasks early on, but the potential win will be the opportunity to grow a significant business and hire a team to do the lower-level work under their direction.
  • Another option – bring on a creative problem solver with appropriate experience who can support the existing team, but who will have more flexibility than a pure specialist.

[like]

How Do Small Companies Outsource Infrastructure? Eight Ideas

Situation: Start-ups and early-stage enterprises are typically both resource and talent constrained. The CEO of a start-up asks how others successfully outsourced infrastructure cost effectively and when they were early-stage so that they could focus on critical success factors and improve their opportunity to succeed. How do small companies outsource infrastructure?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • In the early stages of company development, outsource everything possible and focus our efforts only on the key functions.
  • In order to focus on the most important things first, decide what must be accomplished and when. Set priorities, establish key milestones and create a timeline to measure achievement. Celebrate your successes!
  • Identify the most important strategic foci within your business model and outsource everything else.
    • For example, use outside data centers instead of developing these yourself.
    • With the increase in Cloud-based options, early stage companies can do without the IT infrastructure that they used to need. Just be careful to safeguard your intellectual property!
  • Attend relevant meetings and functions to learn about existing and available capabilities. Look for local networking opportunities relevant to your market.
  • Incubator sites have developed in a number of high tech centers. These are designed to cover infrastructure needs at a reasonable cost so that founders can focus on product and service development.
  • Hire a virtual assistant – you can find these locally using a Google search.
  • Take advantage of lower cost labor and enlist younger, less experienced labor to manage databases and clean records.
  • Set up a wiki for information. This exchange is free and you can tailor it to your needs. It is permission-based; you can find it at pbwiki.com.

[like]

How Do You Evaluate Tradeoffs Between Strategic Options? Six Suggestions

Situation:  A company’s primary objectives are to hone their business model and establish their first satellite office as a model for future expansion. An opportunity has arisen from a trusted source that could rapidly expand both business and opening of satellite offices by providing service to a single national client. How do you evaluate the tradeoffs between these options?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • What is the impact of this new option on client diversity? One of Porter’s fundamentals of strategy is to not have too much of your business dependent on any one customer.
  • What is the impact of this opportunity on your personnel, time and resources?
  • Are there areas in which this opportunity will save time and resources, for example by consolidating some back-office functions like billing and accounting?
  • If this opportunity will take an inordinate amount of time and focus, consider starting a new entity to take advantage of this opportunity.
  • Use a decision-making grid to evaluate the new opportunity versus your present strategy:
    • Identify the most important factors of both your current strategy and the new opportunity.
    • Weight the importance of each factor as a percent of with the total adding up to 100%.
    • Rank each opportunity against each factor.
    • Multiply the factor ranking times the weight for each ranking.
    • Sum the weighted rankings.
    • See whether the summed rankings support of contradict your gut feeling, and further analyze depending on the result.
  • Once you have identified the risks in this proposition, determine contract provisions that will reduce risks to acceptable levels. If the potential client is unwilling to yield enough of these points in the contracting stage to acceptably mitigate your risks, then walk away from the deal.
  • Don’t risk your entire company for one opportunity. Financial rewards are only a scorecard.

Key Words: Expansion, Options, Satellite, Office, Time, Focus, Resources, Trade-offs, Client, Diversity, Consolidation, Function, Corporate Structure, Factor, Weight, Rank, Contract, Mitigate, Risk

[like]