Tag Archives: Stability

How Do You Incentivize Salespeople to Sell? Five Points

Situation: Many companies have challenges creating effective incentives for sales people to sell. The CEO of one company asked others around the table what their experience has been creating effective incentives to maximize the efforts of their salespeople. How do you incentivize salespeople to sell?
Advice from the CEOs:
• The three fundamental sales compensation strategies are commission only, salary only, and base salary plus commission. The group discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
• Commission only. This system is good in the sense that it incentivizes the salesperson to earn as much as possible. Some highly successful sales organizations give new salespeople a “runway” of, for example, a year with a modest salary to establish themselves. Once they have reached the end of the runway, provided that they have proven that they can sell, they shift to commission only. Once on commission they must sell to eat. The down sides are that a high percentage of “rookie” sales reps many do not succeed, and even successful reps may not to be dedicated to the company. Both latter groups may be on the lookout for a more suitable option for themselves or a better deal.
• Salary Only. Unlike commission-based sales, this option may not provide much incentive to excel. It may foster complacency.
• Base salary plus commission. Generally, this system is the one favored by many companies. It gives the salesperson some degree of stability while they are developing their accounts yet motivates them to “break the bank.”
• The best sales systems allow and encourage their salespeople to make a lot of money. In some of these companies salespeople are among the most highly paid people in the company. This boosts both retention and success.

[like]

How Do You Evaluate Career Choices? Three Considerations

Situation: An SMB CEO has sold his business and seeks a new opportunity. Options range from a mid-level position in a large company to various options in existing or start-up smaller companies. How do you evaluate your career choices?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The most important factors are to determine what you want to do and what will make you, and your family, happy. Start with a Pro/Con analysis of each type of opportunity compared with your short and long-term desires. Which among the following choices are more important?

o    Financial stability and some level of job security vs. higher risk and potential reward with lower security.

o    Desire to be a player or to be the person in charge vs. being happy with a staff position.

o    Ability to create your own path or willingness to adapt to the priorities of others.

  • Given these choices, here is what you may find:

o    In a large or established company the most likely opportunity will be a staff position. The trade-off is stability for authority, but be aware that large company organizational politics may be severe.

o    In a small existing company it is possible to be a player in a key position. The trade-off is lower stability and viability for more authority.

o    In a new company there is the chance to be the CEO, bringing business experience to a group with technology expertise. The trade-off is high risk, long hours and low stability for a high level of authority.

  • Other factors to consider are how critical your personal situation is and the depth of your resources. If you have time and flexibility, take the time to find a situation that best meets your needs.

[like]

How do you Maintain Focus on your Core while Expanding? Six Considerations

Interview with Clark Avery, President & CEO, Aesyntix Health

Situation: We’ve established a strong core business and it is time to diversity. Our principal growth opportunity is complimentary to but a different business model from our core. What are best practices for maintaining focus on core business while developing a new opportunity?

Advice:

  • First and foremost, be emotionally and strategically ready to make the bet and commit to action.  In doing so you must “know thyself.” Specifically, taking a long look to determine whether you tend to overanalyze or are too quick to pull the trigger. Understanding your tendencies will help in the steps below.
  • Establish the prerequisites for pulling the trigger. For us we had to determine the:
    • Level of operating stability for the core business that will allow you to split focus.
    • Level of financial stability and predictability that will support both core and expansion efforts.
    • Level of organizational and process stability that will allow you to take on the new opportunity.
  • Understand and define the differences between the old game and the new game.
    • What are the financials of the growth opportunity? How do they differ from your core business? Are there conflicts that must be resolved?
    • Can you launch an innovative solution to differentiate the new offering?
  • Gather enough understanding of market need that you will satisfy with the new opportunity so as to be able to address it effectively.
  • Establish a sound execution strategy and timeframe for launching the new business.
    • Some/many of your decisions will be wrong. You need the resources to tolerate a learning curve while running fast towards your goal.
  • Draft a leadership development plan of both the core and new business before you start. This plan must define the skill sets and growth needs of each business.

You can contact Clark Avery at [email protected]

Key Words: Diversify, Opportunity, Focus, Stability, Market Needs, Execution, Leadership Development   [like]