Tag Archives: Disadvantage

How Do You Incentivize Salespeople to Sell? Five Points

Situation: Many companies have challenges creating effective incentives for sales people to sell. The CEO of one company asked others around the table what their experience has been creating effective incentives to maximize the efforts of their salespeople. How do you incentivize salespeople to sell?
Advice from the CEOs:
• The three fundamental sales compensation strategies are commission only, salary only, and base salary plus commission. The group discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
• Commission only. This system is good in the sense that it incentivizes the salesperson to earn as much as possible. Some highly successful sales organizations give new salespeople a “runway” of, for example, a year with a modest salary to establish themselves. Once they have reached the end of the runway, provided that they have proven that they can sell, they shift to commission only. Once on commission they must sell to eat. The down sides are that a high percentage of “rookie” sales reps many do not succeed, and even successful reps may not to be dedicated to the company. Both latter groups may be on the lookout for a more suitable option for themselves or a better deal.
• Salary Only. Unlike commission-based sales, this option may not provide much incentive to excel. It may foster complacency.
• Base salary plus commission. Generally, this system is the one favored by many companies. It gives the salesperson some degree of stability while they are developing their accounts yet motivates them to “break the bank.”
• The best sales systems allow and encourage their salespeople to make a lot of money. In some of these companies salespeople are among the most highly paid people in the company. This boosts both retention and success.

[like]

How Do You Handle Open Issues from a Sale Agreement? Three Thoughts

Situation: A CEO has closed the sale of a significant company property. Due diligence was completed and was satisfactory, but the purchaser now wants to renegotiate the price. The CEO is concerned that if she yields on the price, the buyer will come up with additional changes that will further disadvantage the sale. How do you handle open issues from a sale agreement?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • One member had a similar issue following the sale of a previous company. The decision was that the price at the time of close was the price. The buyer had full opportunity to perform due diligence which would have uncovered any open issues. Condition at time of sale is “buyer beware,” which is why they were allowed a full due diligence.
  • The sale was “as is” including assumption of current debt on the property. It appears that the advantages to the buyer that are anticipated through the purchase will more than offset the impact of the existing debt. As a result, the buyer is, on balance, better off than they had anticipated. Thus, there is no need to yield on price.
  • On the timing of events that may not occur – an indirect cost audit by the company’s prime agency should this be necessary – there is a question of the financial impact to the company.
    • There is a default date on the final payment that could be held up by the negotiation, but the impact is not significant to the company.
    • Otherwise, the company’s interests are covered by the sale agreement.

[like]