Tag Archives: Push

How Do You Manage Seasonal Gaps in Project Flow? Five Options

Situation: A company experiences seasonal gaps in project flow. This makes it difficult to project both cash flow and staffing needs into the future. In addition, monthly cash flow tends to be uneven. What can they do to improve control of internal and external resources in this environment? How do you manage seasonal gaps in project flow?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The company currently focuses 60% on consulting and 40% on internal projects, some of which produce future projects. Relative proportions shift over time, and projects can be cancelled.
  • Try to write the company’s contracts to push revenue to early stages of a project, so that there is more cash cushion to help ride out short cash periods.
  • Look for options to change the business model to increase financial flexibility.
    • If there are significant margin differentials between different types of projects this has overhead implications when resources are shifted.
    • Look for ways to allocate less expensive resources or virtual resources with a lower cost to lower margin projects. Look for opportunities to utilize remote resources if these resources cost less.
  • Adjust staff assignments to maximize payoff, as well as staff retention options. Look for project work opportunities.
  • Analyze and evaluate the ability to switch personnel between paying projects and internal development projects.

[like]

How Do You Shift from an Operational to a Strategic Focus? Three Points

Situation: A CEO is concerned that her company is too focused on day-to-day operations with much less focus on strategic objectives and initiatives. She estimates that the company is 75% day to day vs. 25% strategic. What is the best way to shift the focus, and over what timeframe? How do you shift from an operational to a strategic focus?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Look at the current mix between day-to-day and strategic activity, set a timeframe for the shift and set interim objectives.
    • For example, if the current mix is perceived as 75% DTD / 25% Strategic, set monthly objectives to move first to 50% / 50% and eventually 25 DTD / 75% Strategic.
  • While the objective is to move the CEO’s and company’s activity more in the strategic direction, it is necessary to assure that the day-to-day bases are being covered.
    • Select a key member of the team to take on this responsibility and train that individual to assure that the day-to-day operations are covered as the company makes this transition. This will be a bonus for the individual selected and will help to deepen the organizations talent pool.
  • During weekly meetings push the discussion more toward the strategic direction.
    • How can the metrics and operational reports be automated and readily available to team members so that less time is spent on this during weekly meetings? Consider an executive dashboard – developed by the CEO and key staff but maintained and updated by staff.
    • This will help to build confidence that the team is able to monitor the business and should reduce the time spent understanding operations. This will allow the team to focus more on strategic vision and plans.
    • This is also important to the company’s ability to monitor operations in its remote locations as these are set up.

[like]

How Do You Rapidly Ramp Sales? Three Tactics

Situation: A company’s key marketing partner has excelled at analyzing key potential customers, the right decision makers within those customers, and completing sales to them at a premium price. The CEO wants advice on what more they can do with this partner to leverage and boost sales. How do you rapidly ramp sales?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • The company’s current strategy is to start a customer on the company’s product to add additional functionality. Once the customer learns to use the product, they work to extend the customer to other products from the company.
  • It is difficult to win with a “push” sales strategy. The situation described is like that of Linux competing with Microsoft. Everyone knows how to use MSFT, and for most of what they do MSFT is good enough. It takes a particular level of pain or need to justify the pain of transitioning to something different.
    • The only alternative is to show a significant pay-back for the pain that the customer must endure in order to convert, large scale, to another solution.
  • The company’s target customer will be the key manager who will shut down the line because they don’t have the company’s solution. This forces the purchase decision above the manager’s boss to the executive suite. The company’s solution then becomes the alternative that saves the day.
    • Seek a forum or trade show that will put the company’s solution in front of these key managers. Through this venue, create buzz that will make the company’s the booth to visit.
    • It is critical to have a compelling story for potential users when they respond to this gambit and visit the company’s booth.
  • The solution to this dilemma is the same as the solution to the company’s overall strategy.
    • The company’s offering, at this point, is just another alternative available to the customer. While the company has a compelling product, it is not world changing and the company lacks the market presence to make its solutions first to adoption.
    • The solution is to focus. Stop what the company is currently doing and take the time to develop a technology strategy.
    • Once this strategy has been defined, focus efforts on developing the killer application that becomes the reason that people must come to the company to satisfy their need.
    • Once this killer application has been developed, positioning and gaining traction with the customer will become easier.

[like]