Tag Archives: Correct

How Do You Improve Performance Reviews? Three Approaches

Situation: A CEO’s company sets objectives for employees; however these objectives frequently aren’t met. There are lots of excuses for not meeting objectives. Most frustrating, employees are eager to share good news, but hide bad news and performance issues. What have other CEOs done to prevent these problems? How do you improve performance reviews?
Advice from the CEOs:
• A service company instituted frequent measurement of performance against objectives. Top staff monitors key metrics in weekly meetings that last at most one hour. They use a problem solving approach to address obstacles and to correct performance. The CEO oversees the direction with staff making and instituting changes to correct low performance. The key is in the metrics. Metrics must measure meaningful performance and must be tied directly to company objectives.
• A light manufacturing company had a history of holding on to non-performing individuals for too long. The CEO addressed this by instituting objectives and eliminating non-performers. The result was reduced complacency and improved morale. Performing employees had been tired of taking up the slack for non-performers. Document non-performance and establish a solid case for eliminating the non-performing employee. Documentation is critical to avoiding wrongful termination suits.
• A general observation: if a company has objectives, but lacks either meaningful metrics to measure performance against objectives or a regular review process to assess performance against objectives, then the objectives are meaningless. The CEOs’ experience is that establishing meaningful SMART (Specific, Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic, Time-Bound) objectives and regularly assessing performance in a collaborative team atmosphere are the most important ingredients to an effective performance management system.

Like

How Do You Hold People Accountable? Four Suggestions

Situation: A new CEO of a small company finds it difficult to hold people accountable. To her, delivering criticism feels like delivering “bad news.” This makes her feel uncomfortable, so she hesitates and often takes care of tasks herself. This cuts into her planning and strategy time. How do you hold people accountable?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • This may be a question of semantics and the view of the task.
    • From a big picture standpoint, real bad news is saying “you’re fired!” By comparison, providing input to correct behavior or results is minor. Consider it coaching instead of bad news.
    • Consider the other person. Constructive feedback is positive. It communicates care about them as a person and their future within the company. It expresses a desire that they do well, and that the CEO is willing to take the time to help them.
  • The CEO’s job is to captain the ship that the team serves. When the CEO “does it herself” instead of providing coaching to others, she has abandoned the wheel. It also suggests that others aren’t up to the job.
  • Step back and look at the CEO’s big picture.
    • Nobody expects immediate perfection. The CEO position was offered because others judged the person as ready for it. They know from experience that learning management takes time.
    • However, they also know that becoming CEO requires giving up past responsibilities. The job is to coach others to perform to company standards.
  • What immediate steps can be taken?
    • Prioritize management time over task time.
    • When a team member’s work needs correction, do this with them. Show them how to correct the work. Coach them to the proper standards. Assure that they are clear on why and how to complete the work.
    • This is a double win – getting the job done in less time (for the CEO) and helping the team member to complete the work correctly the next time.
    • The CEO’s position is not as a resource. The role is to develop resources. This is the new value to the firm, the justification for the CEO’s salary, and the key to future success.

[like]