Tag Archives: Below

How Do You Fund Growth Strategically? Five Approaches

Situation: A CEO is looking at a significant investment in capital equipment. Being considered are not just the cost of the investment, but the opportunity cost of not making the investment and the impact that this will have on the business. An additional consideration is the business mix of the company and whether to shift focus from low volume/high margin to low margin/high volume products. What tools have others used to assess these trade-offs? How do you fund growth strategically?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • Review the company’s approach to contracts. It may be desirable to revise the approach in light of the new objective. The switch from low volume/high margin to low margin/high volume products impacts not only production but also marketing, sales, finance and accounting.
  • Price some early new contracts below market to finance the additional equipment expenditures, as well as to test market response to the new offering. This will help to identify additional adjustments that are needed for the new approach and offering to succeed.
  • Structure the financing options for equipment purchases creatively, for example by allowing for participation by customers and investors.
  • Watch changes in working capital at all times and keep it under control. Working capital is a commitment of resources just as is buying equipment or facilities.
  • Consider all resource commitments as investments, regardless of the way the accountants deal with them as in expensing vs. capitalizing these investments on the balance sheet. For example, a marketing program is an investment even though it will show up as an operating expense. Make sure that this can be justified in terms of future cash flows expected.

[like]

How Do You Build an Effective Compensation Plan? Six Suggestions

Situation: A company hires and trains engineers from outside of their field. Their pay scale is typically below market for engineers in this field. Once the company trains them, these engineers are candidates for recruitment by other firms in the field that are considered premium employers. The CEO wants to address this situation. How do you build an effective compensation plan?

Advice from the CEOs:

  • In addition to compensation, a high-quality workplace and work experience are equally important.
  • Give the lead engineer or team compensation tied either to engineering charges or gross profit on successful projects. This can be a small percentage – but offers them a compensation upside that they are unlikely to find at another company.
  • Create a peer-recognition award like another company’s RAVE Award (Recognition, Achievement, Value, and Enthusiasm). On a regular basis – perhaps quarterly – the engineering team has the opportunity to select one of their members for this award. Components of the award may include a plaque, a free dinner or massage, or something that team members value. Ask them what they would like to see as rewards within the program.
  • A similar technique is a peer recognition box. Engineers nominate peers for recognition based on performance in a team project. At regular intervals, draw a name from the peer recognition box, with the winner receiving, for example, a gift certificate. The dollars are less important to the recipient than the recognition.
  • Focus on making the company “the place for talented engineers to work.” This can be as much a cultural situation as a place to make a great salary. The more that the company creates a fun and personally rewarding culture, the more it builds “stickiness” into the job. Ask the team for their input to shape the team and work environment.
  • Provide performance incentives for meeting quality objectives while exceeding time objectives. This beats existing cost estimates, so share some of the savings with the team working on the project.
  • Make special company celebrations a regular part of the company culture – for example, evenings out at premium restaurants and including spouses or significant others. By treating significant others well, the company creates a disincentive for the employee to leave.

[like]