Situation: A CEO is considering two options to pay sales people – base/draw plus commission, or no base/draw and larger commission. What do other CEOs find most successful? How to you pay sales reps?

Advice from the CEOs:

• Align the sales incentive plans to company objectives. Two examples were offered, one of an aligned system and one of a dysfunctional system:
• The aligned system. Sales reps are 100% commission (plus expenses) with no caps on income. They are measured by two sets of metrics. To keep their jobs, they have to achieve a minimum of 85% of their revenue goal. Fall below this and the rep is out the door. However, commissions are calculated on the gross profit achieved on sales, and reps are provided with software to calculate GP and commission. This company is the most successful in its market.
• The dysfunctional system. Sales reps are paid a base plus quarterly commissions calculated on achievement of revenue goals. The net result was that reps had no incentive to preserve gross margins. The result was constant conflict between sales and finance. The situation only started to improve as reps’ commissions were converted to a combination of revenue and margin.
• The Key Issue: What is the role of the rep within the sale? Is the rep a door opener or a closer? What percentage of the close is attributable to the rep? In a complex or staged sale, allocate commissions based on contribution to the close. Reps who can’t close are not as valuable as those who can.

[Like]