Situation: A CEO’s company sets objectives for employees; however these objectives frequently aren’t met. There are lots of excuses for not meeting objectives. Most frustrating, employees are eager to share good news, but hide bad news and performance issues. What have other CEOs done to prevent these problems? How do you improve performance reviews?
Advice from the CEOs:
• A service company instituted frequent measurement of performance against objectives. Top staff monitors key metrics in weekly meetings that last at most one hour. They use a problem solving approach to address obstacles and to correct performance. The CEO oversees the direction with staff making and instituting changes to correct low performance. The key is in the metrics. Metrics must measure meaningful performance and must be tied directly to company objectives.
• A light manufacturing company had a history of holding on to non-performing individuals for too long. The CEO addressed this by instituting objectives and eliminating non-performers. The result was reduced complacency and improved morale. Performing employees had been tired of taking up the slack for non-performers. Document non-performance and establish a solid case for eliminating the non-performing employee. Documentation is critical to avoiding wrongful termination suits.
• A general observation: if a company has objectives, but lacks either meaningful metrics to measure performance against objectives or a regular review process to assess performance against objectives, then the objectives are meaningless. The CEOs’ experience is that establishing meaningful SMART (Specific, Measurable, Appropriate, Realistic, Time-Bound) objectives and regularly assessing performance in a collaborative team atmosphere are the most important ingredients to an effective performance management system.

Like